header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012 / James Wilson
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Diva in dispute

James Wilson on a not-so-silent screen star’s day in court

 

The film The Artist has recently given us a superb portrayal of a watershed time in Hollywood history. Not to be outdone, the English law reports of the day contain another. 

Young starlet

In 1931 a young American actress achieved every aspiring thespian’s dream: a contract with a major Hollywood studio. She was not particularly well-known at the time, but soon gained critical and commercial acclaim, enabling her to renegotiate her contract on more favourable terms a few years later. 

Nevertheless, she became disillusioned with the standard of roles she was being asked to play, and eventually moved to London to escape the punitive (as she saw it) terms of the contract. The studio, Warner Bros, took exception, and applied for an injunction in the English courts to prevent her from committing any breach. The actress defended the case under her married name of Ruth Nelson, but by then was known to all by her stage name: Bette Davis.

Exclusive deal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll