header-logo header-logo

Diversity: Regulating for change

14 October 2022 / Simon Blandy
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Features , Profession , Regulatory , Diversity
printer mail-detail
97410
Simon Blandy discusses the role of the regulator in increasing diversity & inclusion in the legal profession
  • Legal regulators have an important role in improving diversity and inclusion in the profession and ensuring the legal sector reflects more closely the communities it serves.
  • Current initiatives include increasing the accuracy and effectiveness of data collection, constructive engagement and support to ensure the routes to law are open to all, and collaboration—with partners from within and beyond the legal profession.

The Legal Services Board (LSB) concluded in its ‘State of Legal Services 2020’ report that, even though there had been some improvements, overall progress in improving diversity and inclusion within the legal services sector had been slow.

A number of different initiatives and approaches have been employed across the legal sector in an attempt to improve diversity and inclusion. Law firms of course are often held up to scrutiny, more so recently, to ensure their workforce is diverse and accurately represents the client base the profession serves.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll