header-logo header-logo

Diversity: Regulating for change

14 October 2022 / Simon Blandy
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Features , Profession , Regulatory , Diversity
printer mail-detail
97410
Simon Blandy discusses the role of the regulator in increasing diversity & inclusion in the legal profession
  • Legal regulators have an important role in improving diversity and inclusion in the profession and ensuring the legal sector reflects more closely the communities it serves.
  • Current initiatives include increasing the accuracy and effectiveness of data collection, constructive engagement and support to ensure the routes to law are open to all, and collaboration—with partners from within and beyond the legal profession.

The Legal Services Board (LSB) concluded in its ‘State of Legal Services 2020’ report that, even though there had been some improvements, overall progress in improving diversity and inclusion within the legal services sector had been slow.

A number of different initiatives and approaches have been employed across the legal sector in an attempt to improve diversity and inclusion. Law firms of course are often held up to scrutiny, more so recently, to ensure their workforce is diverse and accurately represents the client base the profession serves.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll