header-logo header-logo

26 February 2010 / David Tyme
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Divided we fall

David Tyme reports on a clash of personal belief & official duty

In Ladele v London Borough of Islington the Court of Appeal had to resolve a conflict between the right not to be discriminated against on the grounds of religion or belief, and sexual orientation (see [2009] EWCA CIP 1357, [2009] All ER (D) 148 (Dec)).

Ms Ladele commenced employment with the London Borough of Islington (LBI) in 1992. In November 2002 she became a registrar of births, marriages and deaths and as such held a statutory office.

After the introduction of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) on December 5 2005, LBI was obliged to ensure that sufficient registrars were appointed to carry out the function of civil partnership registrars. Ms Ladele, a Christian, held the view that marriage is the union of a man and a woman and therefore was unable to reconcile her faith with her duties which she viewed as enabling same-sex unions contrary to God’s Law.

Prior to CPA 2004 coming into force, Ms Ladele made it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll