header-logo header-logo

Divided we fall

26 February 2010 / David Tyme
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

David Tyme reports on a clash of personal belief & official duty

In Ladele v London Borough of Islington the Court of Appeal had to resolve a conflict between the right not to be discriminated against on the grounds of religion or belief, and sexual orientation (see [2009] EWCA CIP 1357, [2009] All ER (D) 148 (Dec)).

Ms Ladele commenced employment with the London Borough of Islington (LBI) in 1992. In November 2002 she became a registrar of births, marriages and deaths and as such held a statutory office.

After the introduction of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) on December 5 2005, LBI was obliged to ensure that sufficient registrars were appointed to carry out the function of civil partnership registrars. Ms Ladele, a Christian, held the view that marriage is the union of a man and a woman and therefore was unable to reconcile her faith with her duties which she viewed as enabling same-sex unions contrary to God’s Law.

Prior to CPA 2004 coming into force, Ms Ladele made it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll