header-logo header-logo

Divorce—Financial provision—Lump sum order

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171, [2010] All ER (D) 262 (Oct)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Hughes and Patten LJJ,
27 Oct 2010

The Court of Appeal has given guidance on the approach the court should adopt to divorce cases involving substantial inherited wealth.

David Balcombe QC and Nicholas Westley (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the wife., Tim Amos QC and Oliver Wise (instructed by Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) for the husband.

The parties married in 1985, when the husband was 41 and the wife 29. They had two children. The husband had substantial inherited wealth. The marriage broke down in 2006. Decree Absolute was granted in February 2010. The judge considered that important factors were: “(i) the nature and value of the assets, (ii) the lifestyle during the marriage...(iii) the expenditure of the parties during the marriage and their budgets by reference to that and their estimates of future income needs, (iv) the value of properties that were, or might be, suitable for the wife and children, and (v) the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll