header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Divorce—Financial provision—Lump sum order

Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171, [2010] All ER (D) 262 (Oct)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Hughes and Patten LJJ,
27 Oct 2010

The Court of Appeal has given guidance on the approach the court should adopt to divorce cases involving substantial inherited wealth.

David Balcombe QC and Nicholas Westley (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the wife., Tim Amos QC and Oliver Wise (instructed by Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) for the husband.

The parties married in 1985, when the husband was 41 and the wife 29. They had two children. The husband had substantial inherited wealth. The marriage broke down in 2006. Decree Absolute was granted in February 2010. The judge considered that important factors were: “(i) the nature and value of the assets, (ii) the lifestyle during the marriage...(iii) the expenditure of the parties during the marriage and their budgets by reference to that and their estimates of future income needs, (iv) the value of properties that were, or might be, suitable for the wife and children, and (v)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll