header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
21 October 2016 / Dr Tony Harvey
Issue: 7719 / Categories: Features , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Do the right thing

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7719_harvey

Post Panama Papers & pre-Brexit: how can we encourage corporate lawyers to behave with integrity, asks Dr Tony Harvey

  • A preventative culture of ethical articulation, education and real world support, which values and rewards integrity and makes good behaviour axiomatic for legal professionalism, should be encouraged.

This year has been lived against the backdrop of seemingly never ending scandals in business and professional services. The year opened with more details emerging of FIFA officials taking kick-backs for votes and further controversy about multi-nationals avoiding taxes through clever corporate arrangements. Easter saw the raid on the offices of Mossak Fonseca following the outrage arising from the Panama Papers. Calls to “do the right thing” have never been louder. In the summer, on 8 June, the European Parliament agreed to set up a Panama Papers Inquiry Committee only to be faced, 15 days later, by the UK Brexit vote. Three days after that the UK Commissioner for Financial Stability and Financial Services, Lord Hill, resigned.

In such a squally climate what can

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll