header-logo header-logo

21 October 2016 / Dr Tony Harvey
Issue: 7719 / Categories: Features , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Do the right thing

nlj_7719_harvey

Post Panama Papers & pre-Brexit: how can we encourage corporate lawyers to behave with integrity, asks Dr Tony Harvey

  • A preventative culture of ethical articulation, education and real world support, which values and rewards integrity and makes good behaviour axiomatic for legal professionalism, should be encouraged.

This year has been lived against the backdrop of seemingly never ending scandals in business and professional services. The year opened with more details emerging of FIFA officials taking kick-backs for votes and further controversy about multi-nationals avoiding taxes through clever corporate arrangements. Easter saw the raid on the offices of Mossak Fonseca following the outrage arising from the Panama Papers. Calls to “do the right thing” have never been louder. In the summer, on 8 June, the European Parliament agreed to set up a Panama Papers Inquiry Committee only to be faced, 15 days later, by the UK Brexit vote. Three days after that the UK Commissioner for Financial Stability and Financial Services, Lord Hill, resigned.

In such a squally climate what can

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll