header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Do thy duty

Kenneth Warner examines public bodies and the common law duty of care

When is it right that a public authority acting in pursuance of its statutory functions should be held accountable by way of the tort of negligence? On the consensus of contemporary case law: rarely. This is a position which is surely socially controversial.

In Jain v Trent Strategic Health Authority [2007] EWCA Civ 1186; [2008] 2 WLR 456, the Court of appeal by majority (Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Wilson; Lord Justice Jacob dissenting) held that no duty of care in negligence arose on the part of the defendant authority (Trent) in making an urgent ex parte application to a magistrate for immediate cancellation of the registration of the plaintiff s’ nursing home. The application was granted and the nursing home was closed.

The residents were moved to other accommodation and the Jains’ business was extinguished. Although their appeal under the statutory procedure to a registered homes tribunal succeeded, they were unable to revive it. The Jains had suffered a pure economic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll