header-logo header-logo

06 November 2008
Issue: 7344 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Doc brief

B Mahendra explores issues of responsibility, risk and capacity

The advent of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) means professionals of all kinds—not simply lawyers—are now conscious of the importance of bearing in mind issues of capacity whenever dealing with clients and patients, and making arrangements to determine the same if there is any doubt. Capacity, to put it at its simplest, concerns an understanding of the relevant issues and being able to come to a proper decision on the relevant matters.

The decision made needs only to be valid and it does not matter if it is eccentric, bizarre or capricious. An important issue that can arise is not capacity per se but the possible interaction between capacity and undue influence.

This phenomenon may not arise when it comes to dealing with professionals such as a lawyer in relation to litigation or a doctor when it comes to decision making in relation to whether to accept or refuse medical treatment, but assumes importance where transactions such as disposal of estates and property, where decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll