header-logo header-logo

06 November 2008
Issue: 7344 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Doc brief

B Mahendra explores issues of responsibility, risk and capacity

The advent of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) means professionals of all kinds—not simply lawyers—are now conscious of the importance of bearing in mind issues of capacity whenever dealing with clients and patients, and making arrangements to determine the same if there is any doubt. Capacity, to put it at its simplest, concerns an understanding of the relevant issues and being able to come to a proper decision on the relevant matters.

The decision made needs only to be valid and it does not matter if it is eccentric, bizarre or capricious. An important issue that can arise is not capacity per se but the possible interaction between capacity and undue influence.

This phenomenon may not arise when it comes to dealing with professionals such as a lawyer in relation to litigation or a doctor when it comes to decision making in relation to whether to accept or refuse medical treatment, but assumes importance where transactions such as disposal of estates and property, where decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll