header-logo header-logo

Doc brief

06 November 2008
Issue: 7344 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health
printer mail-detail

B Mahendra explores issues of responsibility, risk and capacity

The advent of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) means professionals of all kinds—not simply lawyers—are now conscious of the importance of bearing in mind issues of capacity whenever dealing with clients and patients, and making arrangements to determine the same if there is any doubt. Capacity, to put it at its simplest, concerns an understanding of the relevant issues and being able to come to a proper decision on the relevant matters.

The decision made needs only to be valid and it does not matter if it is eccentric, bizarre or capricious. An important issue that can arise is not capacity per se but the possible interaction between capacity and undue influence.

This phenomenon may not arise when it comes to dealing with professionals such as a lawyer in relation to litigation or a doctor when it comes to decision making in relation to whether to accept or refuse medical treatment, but assumes importance where transactions such as disposal of estates and property, where decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll