header-logo header-logo

Doc brief

22 November 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

EXPERT WITNESSes AND FACTS >>
STAFF PROTECTION >>
WITNESS INCAPACITY >>

FACTS, OPINIONS AND BIAS

An expert witness needs to work from a factual matrix. Without facts of some kind, an opinion is not feasible; but in litigation difficulty sometimes arises when the facts themselves are in dispute and the tribunal of fact has not yet spoken—it may be awaiting the expert’s opinion to help it find its voice. How is the expert to proceed in these circumstances?

It is in child care proceedings that an expert usually finds himself in difficulty on account of not knowing which version of the facts is true. Allegations of domestic violence and the abuse of children are especially pregnant with disputed facts.

There may be available strategies which assist in bypassing this problem. A parent could deny violence but there could be convictions in his past which may be able to furnish conclusive proof of a tendency to violence as proved to a court’s satisfaction. Even a charge of an offence may indicate that the prosecuting authority had some credible

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll