header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Doc brief

EXPERT WITNESSes AND FACTS >>
STAFF PROTECTION >>
WITNESS INCAPACITY >>

FACTS, OPINIONS AND BIAS

An expert witness needs to work from a factual matrix. Without facts of some kind, an opinion is not feasible; but in litigation difficulty sometimes arises when the facts themselves are in dispute and the tribunal of fact has not yet spoken—it may be awaiting the expert’s opinion to help it find its voice. How is the expert to proceed in these circumstances?

It is in child care proceedings that an expert usually finds himself in difficulty on account of not knowing which version of the facts is true. Allegations of domestic violence and the abuse of children are especially pregnant with disputed facts.

There may be available strategies which assist in bypassing this problem. A parent could deny violence but there could be convictions in his past which may be able to furnish conclusive proof of a tendency to violence as proved to a court’s satisfaction. Even a charge of an offence may indicate that the prosecuting authority had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll