R v Ulcay and another [2007] EWCA Crim 2379, [2007] All ER (D) 296 (Oct)
Are we expecting too much from HIPs? David Marsden reports
In brief
Should UK employers ditch compulsory retirement? asks Juliet Carp
Timothy Fancourt QC explains Sportelli’s impact on determination of enfranchisement prices
In brief
In brief
Deploying more unqualified and unregulated case workers is a false and unjust economy, says Des Hudson
In brief
Andrew Blower and Richard Quenby look at reform of commercial rent arrears recovery
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Birketts—Nathan Evans
Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire
Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta
Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department
Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale
Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return
From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed
