header-logo header-logo

Undercutting justice

22 November 2007 / Desmond Hudson , Desmond Hudson
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Deploying more unqualified and unregulated case workers is a false and unjust economy, says Des Hudson

With the passage of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007), it would be explicable to believe that the controversial legislative changes were behind us—at least for now. But there will be no hiatus. Clause 58 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill may not be on every solicitor’s radar but it poses the same debates—debates that go to the heart of what it is to be a solicitor and the role solicitors play in the criminal justice system.

If enacted unamended, the clause will radically change the role of designated case workers (or DCWs). Those who work in the criminal justice system will have been familiar with DCWs since their introduction in 1999. It is a position that both experienced case workers and those with a legal qualification can attain, presenting some cases in the magistrates’ court and developing limited advocacy skills. And it is also a role that has already been amended twice with internal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll