header-logo header-logo

Undercutting justice

22 November 2007 / Desmond Hudson , Desmond Hudson
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Deploying more unqualified and unregulated case workers is a false and unjust economy, says Des Hudson

With the passage of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007), it would be explicable to believe that the controversial legislative changes were behind us—at least for now. But there will be no hiatus. Clause 58 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill may not be on every solicitor’s radar but it poses the same debates—debates that go to the heart of what it is to be a solicitor and the role solicitors play in the criminal justice system.

If enacted unamended, the clause will radically change the role of designated case workers (or DCWs). Those who work in the criminal justice system will have been familiar with DCWs since their introduction in 1999. It is a position that both experienced case workers and those with a legal qualification can attain, presenting some cases in the magistrates’ court and developing limited advocacy skills. And it is also a role that has already been amended twice with internal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll