header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

CIVIL UNREST

In brief

The number of civil law cases launched in the High Court jumped by a quarter last year—the first increase since the 1999 Woolf reforms triggered a steady decline. At 61,691 last year compared to 49,442 in 2005, the number of High Court commercial law cases is now at its highest for six years, according to Reynolds Porter Chamberlain’s (RPC’s) review of the latest judicial statistics, obtained from the Ministry of Justice in advance of official publication. New types of litigation funding products are increasingly lowering the barriers of entry to litigation, says RPC solicitor, Jonathan Wyles.

Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll