header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 November 2007 / Andrew Blower , Richard Quenby
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Reforming recovery

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Andrew Blower and Richard Quenby look at reform of commercial rent arrears recovery

The Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCEA 2007) abolishes a landlord’s ancient right of distress against his tenant and in its place introduces a new regime for commercial rent arrears recovery (CRAR).
TCEA 2007 also brings about a partial reform of the law relating to bailiffs: only an enforcement agent certificated by a judge in accordance with TCEA 2007 may be used by a landlord to take control of goods under CRAR.
Although TCEA 2007 was passed on 19 July 2007, the provisions relating to CRAR will not come into force until the necessary enabling legislation has been introduced. It is anticipated that this will be in early 2008.

WHEN CAN CRAR BE USED?

CRAR is available only to a landlord under a written lease of commercial premises. “Lease” means any tenancy in law or equity—including a tenancy at will—but not a tenancy at sufferance. Premises will not qualify as commercial if all or any part of them is lawfully

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Is inequality undermining trust?
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
NLJ this week: Freemasons ruling backs police transparency over privacy claims
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
NLJ this week: Right to grieve marks ‘major shift’ in employment law
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
NLJ this week: AI privilege battles expose risks
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
NLJ this week: Experts warned—AI use must be transparent
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll