header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 November 2007 / Andrew Blower , Richard Quenby
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Reforming recovery

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Andrew Blower and Richard Quenby look at reform of commercial rent arrears recovery

The Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCEA 2007) abolishes a landlord’s ancient right of distress against his tenant and in its place introduces a new regime for commercial rent arrears recovery (CRAR).
TCEA 2007 also brings about a partial reform of the law relating to bailiffs: only an enforcement agent certificated by a judge in accordance with TCEA 2007 may be used by a landlord to take control of goods under CRAR.
Although TCEA 2007 was passed on 19 July 2007, the provisions relating to CRAR will not come into force until the necessary enabling legislation has been introduced. It is anticipated that this will be in early 2008.

WHEN CAN CRAR BE USED?

CRAR is available only to a landlord under a written lease of commercial premises. “Lease” means any tenancy in law or equity—including a tenancy at will—but not a tenancy at sufferance. Premises will not qualify as commercial if all or any part of them is lawfully

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll