header-logo header-logo

Reforming recovery

22 November 2007 / Andrew Blower , Richard Quenby
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Andrew Blower and Richard Quenby look at reform of commercial rent arrears recovery

The Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCEA 2007) abolishes a landlord’s ancient right of distress against his tenant and in its place introduces a new regime for commercial rent arrears recovery (CRAR).
TCEA 2007 also brings about a partial reform of the law relating to bailiffs: only an enforcement agent certificated by a judge in accordance with TCEA 2007 may be used by a landlord to take control of goods under CRAR.
Although TCEA 2007 was passed on 19 July 2007, the provisions relating to CRAR will not come into force until the necessary enabling legislation has been introduced. It is anticipated that this will be in early 2008.

WHEN CAN CRAR BE USED?

CRAR is available only to a landlord under a written lease of commercial premises. “Lease” means any tenancy in law or equity—including a tenancy at will—but not a tenancy at sufferance. Premises will not qualify as commercial if all or any part of them is lawfully

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll