header-logo header-logo

Getting the right price

22 November 2007 / Timothy Fancourt
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Timothy Fancourt QC explains Sportelli’s impact on determination of enfranchisement prices

Successive Acts of Parliament, starting with the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (LRA 1967), have given tenants of houses and flats (in defined circumstances) the right to acquire a freehold interest or an extended lease from their landlords. This legislation has always been contentious. LRA 1967 was challenged in the European Court of Human Rights as infringing the principle against expropriation of property without proper compensation, but the challenge failed. Perhaps in consequence, the rights conferred by the Acts are compendiously described and known as “enfranchisement”.

leasehold enfranchisement

Leasehold enfranchisement is regarded as a highly technical and rather specialist area of practice. It seems to produce highly technical decisions, many of which defy easy understanding. On occasions, however, a decision is made that has wide and general importance for practitioners who do handle enfranchisement claims. The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Earl Cadogan v Sportelli [2007] EWCA Civ 1042, [2007] All ER (D) 396 (Oct) is one such case. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll