header-logo header-logo

Getting the right price

22 November 2007 / Timothy Fancourt
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Timothy Fancourt QC explains Sportelli’s impact on determination of enfranchisement prices

Successive Acts of Parliament, starting with the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (LRA 1967), have given tenants of houses and flats (in defined circumstances) the right to acquire a freehold interest or an extended lease from their landlords. This legislation has always been contentious. LRA 1967 was challenged in the European Court of Human Rights as infringing the principle against expropriation of property without proper compensation, but the challenge failed. Perhaps in consequence, the rights conferred by the Acts are compendiously described and known as “enfranchisement”.

leasehold enfranchisement

Leasehold enfranchisement is regarded as a highly technical and rather specialist area of practice. It seems to produce highly technical decisions, many of which defy easy understanding. On occasions, however, a decision is made that has wide and general importance for practitioners who do handle enfranchisement claims. The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Earl Cadogan v Sportelli [2007] EWCA Civ 1042, [2007] All ER (D) 396 (Oct) is one such case. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll