header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

02 March 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

False witness dilemmas, Importance of reasoned conclusions, Judicial review of council decisions

COMPLAINANT CREDIBILITY

The problem of false witness is especially acute where intimate situations are concerned when accounts by independent witnesses may be lacking. In those instances the behaviour of the complainant or victim may assume paramount importance. Two recent cases bearing on this issue came to the attention of the courts in different circumstances.

In R v Soroya [2006] EWCA Crim 3120, [2006] All ER (D) 152 (Dec) the appellant had been convicted of rape. He had also been acquitted of indecently assaulting the same complainant two days before the rape. He appealed on the ground that the complainant had given a false account of a earlier sexual attack on her and also that her actions since the trial raised doubts about her credibility, in that she had swiftly formed a relationship with a wealthy employer many years her senior, in circumstances similar to those in which she had met the appellant.

Motivation

The complainant was a Polish woman aged 19 who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll