header-logo header-logo

02 March 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

False witness dilemmas, Importance of reasoned conclusions, Judicial review of council decisions

COMPLAINANT CREDIBILITY

The problem of false witness is especially acute where intimate situations are concerned when accounts by independent witnesses may be lacking. In those instances the behaviour of the complainant or victim may assume paramount importance. Two recent cases bearing on this issue came to the attention of the courts in different circumstances.

In R v Soroya [2006] EWCA Crim 3120, [2006] All ER (D) 152 (Dec) the appellant had been convicted of rape. He had also been acquitted of indecently assaulting the same complainant two days before the rape. He appealed on the ground that the complainant had given a false account of a earlier sexual attack on her and also that her actions since the trial raised doubts about her credibility, in that she had swiftly formed a relationship with a wealthy employer many years her senior, in circumstances similar to those in which she had met the appellant.

Motivation

The complainant was a Polish woman aged 19 who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll