header-logo header-logo

25 August 2015 / Simon Duncan
Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Dodgy dealings

Where next for FX claims, asks Simon Duncan

For many litigators, news that several of the world’s largest banks had been found guilty of manipulating the foreign exchange rates by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) was thought likely to lead to a new rash of claims against those banks. Progress however, appears to have been slow.

Hurdles

In terms of the legal issues, a parallel can be drawn with claims against banks for interest rate swaps mis-selling. Many of the same legal issues arise. However, on a practical level any successful FX claim needs to get over the following additional hurdles:

Take any currency pair, sterling/dollar at 1.6044 for example (one pound buys 1.6044 dollars). A manufacturer in England selling goods to America receives payment in dollars. He buys sterling from his bank in England with those dollars. If we ignore the bid/offer spread, a million dollars buys £623,285.96 at that exchange rate.

It is alleged that the sterling/dollar rate has been manipulated, say from 1.6044 to 1.6088. This would mean that the manufacturer receives £621,581.30

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll