header-logo header-logo

Dodgy dealings

25 August 2015 / Simon Duncan
Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Where next for FX claims, asks Simon Duncan

For many litigators, news that several of the world’s largest banks had been found guilty of manipulating the foreign exchange rates by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) was thought likely to lead to a new rash of claims against those banks. Progress however, appears to have been slow.

Hurdles

In terms of the legal issues, a parallel can be drawn with claims against banks for interest rate swaps mis-selling. Many of the same legal issues arise. However, on a practical level any successful FX claim needs to get over the following additional hurdles:

Take any currency pair, sterling/dollar at 1.6044 for example (one pound buys 1.6044 dollars). A manufacturer in England selling goods to America receives payment in dollars. He buys sterling from his bank in England with those dollars. If we ignore the bid/offer spread, a million dollars buys £623,285.96 at that exchange rate.

It is alleged that the sterling/dollar rate has been manipulated, say from 1.6044 to 1.6088. This would mean that the manufacturer receives £621,581.30

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll