header-logo header-logo

09 April 2014
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Does the early bird catch the worm?

Cautious welcome for new early conciliation employment procedures

Employment lawyers have given a cautious welcome to new early conciliation procedures.

Under the new system, prospective claimants register their dispute with ACAS, which then investigates whether early conciliation can be achieved. It came into force on 6 April, and becomes mandatory on 5 May. Applicants will not be allowed to lodge a claim with the tribunal unless they have a certificate from ACAS showing early conciliation was not possible.

Early conciliation will be free of charge. By contrast, employment tribunal issue and hearing fees were introduced last April, resulting in a dramatic 79% decrease in claims.

Christina Tolvas-Vincent, partner, Bond Dickinson, says: “Early conciliation is a hurdle for the employee to jump over before they go to the tribunal, and because there is no incentive for them, there may be occasions where the employee or employer will not engage.

“Employers may know that there has been a decrease in claims since fees were introduced, and may think, why enter into negotiations when the fee may deter a claim. But, we do know that ACAS resolve an awful lot of disputes. 

“Pre-claim conciliation [a voluntary forerunner to the new system] has existed for several years and has been quite successful.”

Emma Hamnett, senior associate at Clarke Willmott, says actual participation in conciliation will remain entirely voluntary. ACAS can make “reasonable attempts” to contact the defendant, although it is not yet clear what will count as “reasonable”, she says. 

If the defendant cannot be reached, or declines to take part, then ACAS will issue an early conciliation certificate. The period for early conciliation is one month from receipt of the form, although a 14-day extension can be granted if both parties agree.

Hamnett says: “There is no uncertainty around time limits but unrepresented claimants could end up missing deadlines, and the respondent’s solicitors will run that point, so there could be satellite litigation around that.

“The new system is not going to encourage more people to bring their claims but it might encourage early conciliation. You can’t force people to negotiate against their will.”

 

Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll