header-logo header-logo

Domestic Abuse Bill consultation launched

08 March 2018
Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

The Prime Minister, Home Secretary and Justice Secretary have launched a much-anticipated consultation ahead of a draft Domestic Abuse Bill.

The proposals include new Domestic Abuse Protection Orders to give courts powers to electronically tag abusers or force them to attend a programme to address their underlying attitudes or addictions. It would be a criminal offence to breach such an order.

A statutory aggravating factor for domestic abuse could be introduced in sentencing, similar to those already in law for hate crimes, where the abuse involves or affects a child. A Domestic Abuse Commissioner would be appointed to hold the government to account.

Economic abuse would be recognised for the first time as a type of domestic abuse, covering controlling circumstances in which victims have finances withheld, are denied access to employment or transport, or are forced to take out loans and enter into other financial contracts.

The consultation, Transforming the Response to Domestic Abuse, also suggests a new statutory definition of domestic abuse as ‘any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive, threatening behaviour, violence or abuse…’.

‘Controlling behaviour’ is defined as ‘a range of acts designed to make a person subordinate and/or dependent by isolating them from sources of support, exploiting their resources and capacities for personal gain, depriving them of the means needed for independence, resistance and escape and regulating their everyday behaviour’.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd said: ‘This is a once in a generation opportunity to transform our entire approach to this terrible crime. I call on everyone, but especially those who have suffered abuse in any form, to speak out and help shape the way we approach this crime for years to come.’

Views are welcomed from all affected by, or concerned about, domestic abuse, by 31 May 2018.

The government also introduced changes this week to allow the estimated 12,000 survivors of domestic abuse living in refuges to register their vote anonymously. They can now register without fear their abusive partners will find their names and addresses on the electoral roll.

The consultation launch confirmed the expectations of family law solicitor-advocate and NLJ columnist David Burrows, who suggested earlier this week that a consultation was imminent.

Burrows, writing in Family Law eNews, had called on the Home Secretary to ‘align family and criminal proceedings’.

‘So far as dealing with domestic abuse is concerned: there is a convergence between criminal proceedings and family cases; but separate remedies and enforcement,’ he said.

He also urged the government to introduce ‘clearer and much less confusing legal aid’ for abuse victims, and to make resources available to pay for special measures for vulnerable abuse victims.

‘There must be an appreciation of the urgency of the whole exercise of such badly needed law reform,’ he said, ‘and co-ordination between the ministries which are responsible for reform.’

Last week, the Sentencing Council issued guidelines on domestic abuse, for the first time including abuse through social media and online means such as tracking devices, and highlighting that abuse covers psychological, sexual, financial or emotional abuse as well as physical violence.

Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll