header-logo header-logo

24 June 2022 / Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh
Issue: 7984 / Categories: Features , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse: casting a wider net

85508
Does the ever-expanding scope of domestic abuse law risk creating confusion & inconsistency in prosecution? Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh investigates
  • While some of the changes brought about by the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 are welcome, others—such as the expansion of the offence of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’—risk causing inconsistency in sentencing due to the overlap with existing offences.

In the October 2019 edition of Corker Binning’s The Knowledge I wrote about the (then relatively new) offence of controlling or coercive behaviour (CCB) created by the Serious Crime Act 2015 (SCA 2015). I argued that the extraordinarily wide ambit of CCB might result in its abuse by litigants in acrimonious divorce or separation proceedings. Since that article, it is this firm’s experience that the investigation and prosecution of CCB has been a mixed bag. Some allegations of CCB have been meritorious and have rightly resulted in successful convictions. Other allegations of CCB have been nakedly abusive and constructed entirely to achieve a collateral advantage in family or other proceedings.

Room for improvement?

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll