header-logo header-logo

24 June 2022 / Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh
Issue: 7984 / Categories: Features , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse: casting a wider net

85508
Does the ever-expanding scope of domestic abuse law risk creating confusion & inconsistency in prosecution? Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh investigates
  • While some of the changes brought about by the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 are welcome, others—such as the expansion of the offence of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’—risk causing inconsistency in sentencing due to the overlap with existing offences.

In the October 2019 edition of Corker Binning’s The Knowledge I wrote about the (then relatively new) offence of controlling or coercive behaviour (CCB) created by the Serious Crime Act 2015 (SCA 2015). I argued that the extraordinarily wide ambit of CCB might result in its abuse by litigants in acrimonious divorce or separation proceedings. Since that article, it is this firm’s experience that the investigation and prosecution of CCB has been a mixed bag. Some allegations of CCB have been meritorious and have rightly resulted in successful convictions. Other allegations of CCB have been nakedly abusive and constructed entirely to achieve a collateral advantage in family or other proceedings.

Room for improvement?

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll