header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Domestic violence laws should protect victims

News

Family lawyers claim new laws designed to punish perpetrators of domestic abuse may reduce the likelihood of offences being reported.
From 1 July this year, the
Domestic Violence Crime and Victims Act 2004 makes breach of a non-molestation or occupation order a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment—currently it is a civil offence.
Resolution says the change may deter victims from reporting attacks or taking action if they know the perpetrator could end up with a criminal record.  
Jane McCulloch, Resolution’s vice chair, says: “We are in no way playing down the devastating effects of domestic violence in all its forms. Neither are we questioning the good intentions of the legislators. But, first and foremost, the law should protect the victim rather than punish the perpetrator.”  

McCulloch adds that the Act gives the criminal court the power to make restraining orders for any violent offence, even on acquittal. “The risk here is that, even when acquitted, the alleged perpetrator could be kept away from the family home with devastating effects on family relationships,” she says.
However, Baroness Scotland QC, the minister responsible for domestic violence issues, defended the legislation saying domestic violence must stop.

“We have more to do to urge women that the help is out there and they must come forward if they are a victim of this heinous crime,” she says.

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll