header-logo header-logo

Domestic violence laws should protect victims

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

News

Family lawyers claim new laws designed to punish perpetrators of domestic abuse may reduce the likelihood of offences being reported.
From 1 July this year, the
Domestic Violence Crime and Victims Act 2004 makes breach of a non-molestation or occupation order a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment—currently it is a civil offence.
Resolution says the change may deter victims from reporting attacks or taking action if they know the perpetrator could end up with a criminal record.  
Jane McCulloch, Resolution’s vice chair, says: “We are in no way playing down the devastating effects of domestic violence in all its forms. Neither are we questioning the good intentions of the legislators. But, first and foremost, the law should protect the victim rather than punish the perpetrator.”  

McCulloch adds that the Act gives the criminal court the power to make restraining orders for any violent offence, even on acquittal. “The risk here is that, even when acquitted, the alleged perpetrator could be kept away from the family home with devastating effects on family relationships,” she says.
However, Baroness Scotland QC, the minister responsible for domestic violence issues, defended the legislation saying domestic violence must stop.

“We have more to do to urge women that the help is out there and they must come forward if they are a victim of this heinous crime,” she says.

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll