header-logo header-logo

26 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Don’t suffer in silence

SRA initiative supports solicitors' mental health & wellbeing

Solicitors suffering from stress and mental health issues are to be given individually tailored support, in a new Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) initiative.

The SRA launched its Your health, your career package of support last week to coincide with Mental Health Awareness Week. Its initiative highlights the importance of managing the risks of ill health early to stop problems spiralling out of control.

It is asking solicitors to contact it if they are worried about their health so it can direct them to sources of help. These include a one-stop-shop webpage providing help, practical advice from the SRA’s professional ethics team and a call-back service for small firms concerned about regulatory matters.

The SRA is offering solicitors a dedicated person to work with them and tailor processes to suit their requirements. It has promised that communications will be handled sensitively and that extensions to deadlines may be granted where possible.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, says: “We can provide a dedicated person to work with, talk regularly, look at extending deadlines when we can, signpost to help, and communicate in a way that suits best.”

Several support agencies for lawyers already exist, including LawCare which helps lawyers with a wide range of issues such as stress, bullying and addiction. The Solicitors’ Assistance Scheme provides confidential guidance and counselling for solicitors. The Solicitors Benevolent Association helps solicitors in financial trouble. The Law Society also provides confidential advice on practice and procedure through the Law Society Practice Advice Service (e-mail: practiceadvice@lawsociety.org.uk) and Lawyerline (e-mail: lawyerline@lawsociety.org.uk).

Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll