header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Oliver Assersohn
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Don't mis-sell & don't be unfair!

Oliver Assersohn examines the significance of the FSA's message

* * * * * *

At the beginning of the year the Financial Services Authority (FSA) found that Pacific Continental Securities UK Limited (PCS) had failed to conduct its business with integrity, in breach of principle 1 of the FSA's Principles of Business. One of the findings was that PCS had permitted advisers to continue to engage in inappropriate selling practices despite awareness of those failings.

“The bible”

The selling practices were described in a manual known as “the bible” which was provided by PCS to advisers and which contained suggested ways of overcoming customers' objections.

For example, if a customer wanted to talk to his wife the recommended approach was to say: “If you want me to call you back so you can ask your wife if you can buy the stock, I'll ring mine and see if I can sell it to you, in all seriousness…”

If the customer was unsure about whether to proceed with the trade

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll