header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

A double-edged sword

Living in the public eye is an inevitable consequence of fame, says Michael Nash

In early August two matters brought a simmering ire to boiling point. These were the Max Mosley case, brought against the News of the World, and the report in the Evening Standard that the Duke of Edinburgh had prostate cancer, which led to a test case against the British media via the Press Complaints Commission (PCC).

The duke has long been at loggerheads with the press due to what he perceives are intrusions into royal privacy, but central to this issue is the key factor of what constitutes “public interest”. The duke is a public figure. He is the consort of the head of state and the father of the heir to the throne. He cannot pretend to be a private figure, although of course, like everyone, he has a private life. The trouble is that the private lives of public figures are of interest to all. This is the price of fame or public status.

This is of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll