header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

A double-edged sword

Living in the public eye is an inevitable consequence of fame, says Michael Nash

In early August two matters brought a simmering ire to boiling point. These were the Max Mosley case, brought against the News of the World, and the report in the Evening Standard that the Duke of Edinburgh had prostate cancer, which led to a test case against the British media via the Press Complaints Commission (PCC).

The duke has long been at loggerheads with the press due to what he perceives are intrusions into royal privacy, but central to this issue is the key factor of what constitutes “public interest”. The duke is a public figure. He is the consort of the head of state and the father of the heir to the throne. He cannot pretend to be a private figure, although of course, like everyone, he has a private life. The trouble is that the private lives of public figures are of interest to all. This is the price of fame or public status.

This is of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll