header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

A double-edged sword

Living in the public eye is an inevitable consequence of fame, says Michael Nash

In early August two matters brought a simmering ire to boiling point. These were the Max Mosley case, brought against the News of the World, and the report in the Evening Standard that the Duke of Edinburgh had prostate cancer, which led to a test case against the British media via the Press Complaints Commission (PCC).

The duke has long been at loggerheads with the press due to what he perceives are intrusions into royal privacy, but central to this issue is the key factor of what constitutes “public interest”. The duke is a public figure. He is the consort of the head of state and the father of the heir to the throne. He cannot pretend to be a private figure, although of course, like everyone, he has a private life. The trouble is that the private lives of public figures are of interest to all. This is the price of fame or public status.

This is of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll