header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Down & out

istock_000012267319medium_0

What impact does bankruptcy have on a lump sum order obligation, asks Edward Heaton

In McRoberts v McRoberts [2012] EWHC 2966 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 12 (Nov), Hildyard J, in the Chancery Division, considered the impact of bankruptcy on a husband’s obligation to meet a lump sum order.

Background

The parties entered into a financial agreement in 2003, the terms of which were recorded in a consent order dated 1 April 2003. Among other things, the consent order provided for the husband, who was the applicant in the proceedings before Hildyard J, to make a lump sum payment of £450,000 to the wife, who was the respondent. The lump sum was stated to be payable by instalments, the final instalment to be paid by 31 March 2009. Interest was to accrue on any late payments and the entirety of the remaining balance of the lump sum outstanding was to fall due in the event of any payment becoming more than 14 days overdue.

The husband failed to make the payments that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll