header-logo header-logo

Drifting apart on consumer protection

17 January 2025 / Sarah Moore , Katie Bohl
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Damages
printer mail-detail
A new Product Liability Directive for Europe, the same old Consumer Protection Act for the UK: will UK claimants be left clinging to the wreckage? Sarah Moore & Katie Bohl analyse the growing rift
  • The new EU Product Liability Directive contains a number of claimant-friendly innovations, including the extension of the longstop period from ten to 25 years, and a reduction in the burden of proof on the injured party.
  • Post-Brexit, UK claimants will not be able to reap the benefits of the new Directive, and must instead continue to bring claims under the almost 40-year-old Consumer Protection Act 1987.

In October 2024, the final text of the new EU Product Liability Directive (2024/2853) (the new PLD) was signed and formally adopted in Strasbourg. This replaces the previously applicable Product Liability Directive 1985 (85/374/EEC) (the old PLD), enshrined in UK law as the Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987).

A new PLD for Europe

The new PLD makes interesting reading and includes several innovations that may well

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll