header-logo header-logo

17 January 2025 / Sarah Moore , Katie Bohl
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Damages
printer mail-detail

Drifting apart on consumer protection

A new Product Liability Directive for Europe, the same old Consumer Protection Act for the UK: will UK claimants be left clinging to the wreckage? Sarah Moore & Katie Bohl analyse the growing rift
  • The new EU Product Liability Directive contains a number of claimant-friendly innovations, including the extension of the longstop period from ten to 25 years, and a reduction in the burden of proof on the injured party.
  • Post-Brexit, UK claimants will not be able to reap the benefits of the new Directive, and must instead continue to bring claims under the almost 40-year-old Consumer Protection Act 1987.

In October 2024, the final text of the new EU Product Liability Directive (2024/2853) (the new PLD) was signed and formally adopted in Strasbourg. This replaces the previously applicable Product Liability Directive 1985 (85/374/EEC) (the old PLD), enshrined in UK law as the Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987).

A new PLD for Europe

The new PLD makes interesting reading and includes several innovations that may well

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll