header-logo header-logo

15 December 2011 / Patrick Wheeler
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Legal services , EU , Profession
printer mail-detail

Due process

Patrick Wheeler explains how to ensure effective service at home & abroad

You vaguely remember him. The keen US lawyer whose card you have lost (but who has kept yours) and who has now e-mailed you to ask how to serve his US district court claim as quickly as possible on an English resident.

Section V of CPR Pt 6 sets out the procedure that can be used where any document in connection with civil or commercial proceedings in a foreign court or tribunal is to be served in England or Wales (CPR 6.48 to 6.52). These rules do not apply in circumstances where the EU Service Regulation applies (CPR 6.48), but the proceedings in question were issued in a US District Court, so the EU Service Regulation does not apply.

The Hague Convention

The CPR makes clear that reference must also be had to the relevant Civil Procedure Convention. In this case it will be the 1965 Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll