header-logo header-logo

20 August 2015
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Duped holiday home owners to get their money back

Thousands of owners and investors who were the subject of either bogus or failed holiday home developments abroad will be able to recover their losses in full after a High Court ruling last month.

The decision in AIG Europe v OC320301 LLP & Ors is a blow for insurers who have argued for some years that clients of law firms which breach their obligations to them are only entitled to a small proportion of their loss because the claims are all aggregated within the minimum cover of £3m. 

David Greene, Edwin Coe litigation partner and NLJ consultant editor says that the threat of this argument usually forces consumers into accepting low offers from the insurers.

“The court has decided, however, that the insurer’s argument is wrong and the clients of law firms are entitled to the cover of £3m each allowing them to make a full recovery of their loss. This is great news for consumers and a real blow for the insurers. 

“It’s so often the classic tale of the dream home turning into a nightmare for purchasers. In the Giambrone case, in which the court has recently found the lawyers liable to its clients, the developments being sold turned out to be the subject of a conspiracy between the IRA and the Calabrian mafia.”

Issue: 7666 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll