header-logo header-logo

11 March 2016 / Christopher Boyd
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Duty calls

001_nlj_7690_boyd

Christopher Boyd on the effect of current technology on directors’s legal duties

Both before and since the coming into force of the Companies Act 2006 (the 2006 Act) much has been written about the effect on corporate and commercial practice of the codification and development of the law on directors duties, ie the move from common law fiduciary duties to the new statutory framework. However, little appears to have been written about the effect which the onward march of technology has had, or should be having, on the methods for achieving and demonstrating compliance with those duties in practice.

Why technology matters

In an age as pioneering and as awash with invention and intellectual property as ours, technology should be forefront in directors’ minds in three respects.

First, intellectual property (whether in the form of patents, designs, technical know-how or even simply databases of client/supplier contacts) will be an important, if not the most valuable, asset of many businesses. This is true across a variety of sectors whether in the oil & gas, manufacturing, supply-chain, information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll