header-logo header-logo

11 March 2016 / Christopher Boyd
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Duty calls

001_nlj_7690_boyd

Christopher Boyd on the effect of current technology on directors’s legal duties

Both before and since the coming into force of the Companies Act 2006 (the 2006 Act) much has been written about the effect on corporate and commercial practice of the codification and development of the law on directors duties, ie the move from common law fiduciary duties to the new statutory framework. However, little appears to have been written about the effect which the onward march of technology has had, or should be having, on the methods for achieving and demonstrating compliance with those duties in practice.

Why technology matters

In an age as pioneering and as awash with invention and intellectual property as ours, technology should be forefront in directors’ minds in three respects.

First, intellectual property (whether in the form of patents, designs, technical know-how or even simply databases of client/supplier contacts) will be an important, if not the most valuable, asset of many businesses. This is true across a variety of sectors whether in the oil & gas, manufacturing, supply-chain, information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll