header-logo header-logo

04 June 2009 / Susan Knox
Issue: 7372 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

E-asy does it

Susan Knox explores the role played by electronically stored information in contemporary legal practice

Now more than ever, organisations document and store a significant amount of information in electronic form, whether typed into an e-mail message, word processing document or spreadsheet, electronically generated in a database, or recorded as a digital photograph, sound recording or a video image. And increasingly often, the resulting electronic files remain electronic only, never taking form on traditional media such as paper or film.

The implications for legal practice are many. Because of the relative ease with which information can be recorded and documentation generated, the volume of potentially relevant documentation relating to any given matter can be great. At the same time, there are more and more places, some truly tiny, in which evidence may be stored, and significant amounts of data may be retained for much longer periods of time. Individuals are also commonly able to remove substantial amounts of data from an organisation's premises or systems, whether for nefarious purposes or inadvertently, with minimal difficulty.

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll