header-logo header-logo

24 June 2010 / Catherine Reeves
Issue: 7423 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Early point scoring counts

Catherine Reeves outlines the advantages of summary judgments

Summary judgment is an invaluable, and much used, process for litigants faced with claims or defences that have “no real prospect of success”. It enables parties to dispose of part or all of a claim/defence and, in the process, saves costs and time (including that of the court). While a successful summary judgment application can bring an end to proceedings, even an unsuccessful one can assist a party to “score the first point” in litigation and weaken his opponent’s armoury early in proceedings. Is it therefore possible that parties might apply for summary judgment in unsuitable cases as losing the application could still result in a tactical success?

Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corporation & others v Recoletos Limited & others

In the recent case of Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corporation & others v Recoletos Limited & others [2010] All ER (D) 241 (May), the claimants applied for summary judgment against the defendants in a case alleging fraud and “corporate theft”. The summary judgment hearing took over three

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll