Easy does it?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.

20 April 2012 / Christopher Warenius

Issue: 7510 / Categories: Features , Property

printer

mail-detail

Will reform resolve the legal minefield of easements by prescription, asks Christopher Warenius

Most property owners would agree that the law relating to easements by prescription can be a bit of a minefield. It has, as the Law Commission’s consultation paper Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits a Prendre suggests, “become too complex over decades and even centuries”.

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in London Tara Hotel v Kensington Close Hotel [2011] EWCA Civ 1356, [2011] All ER (D) 180 (Nov) illustrates the difficulties encountered in practice. The consultation paper seeks to overhaul the current law, but would the landowner in Tara be treated any differently?

Facts

In 1973, London Tara Hotel (LTH) granted a licence to Kensington Close Limited, the owner of the Kensington Close Hotel (KCH), providing for rights to use the service road belonging to LTH in consideration of an annual £1 payment, if demanded. In 1980, unknown to LTH, KCH changed ownership but use of the service road continued, even though the licence had been granted to, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Easy does it?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.

Will reform resolve the legal minefield of easements by prescription, asks Christopher Warenius

Most property owners would agree that the law relating to easements by prescription can be a bit of a minefield. It has, as the Law Commission’s consultation paper Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits a Prendre suggests, “become too complex over decades and even centuries”.

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in London Tara Hotel v Kensington Close Hotel [2011] EWCA Civ 1356, [2011] All ER (D) 180 (Nov) illustrates the difficulties encountered in practice. The consultation paper seeks to overhaul the current law, but would the landowner in Tara be treated any differently?

Facts

In 1973, London Tara Hotel (LTH) granted a licence to Kensington Close Limited, the owner of the Kensington Close Hotel (KCH), providing for rights to use the service road belonging to LTH in consideration of an annual £1 payment, if demanded. In 1980, unknown to LTH, KCH changed ownership but use of the service road continued, even though the licence had been granted to, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS

NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML

The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week

NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity

Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted

NLJ this week: A prince no more?

Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke

NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk

Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'

NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law

In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains

back-to-top-scroll