header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

eBay counterfeit fine

The French courts have ordered eBay to pay Louis Vuitton owner, LVMH, €1.7m (£1.5m) for failing to prevent the sale of LVMH products on its website.

The French courts have ordered eBay to pay Louis Vuitton owner, LVMH, €1.7m (£1.5m) for failing to prevent the sale of LVMH products on its website.  
In July 2008, the French courts imposed an injunction barring the sale or purchase of any LVMH products on eBay, irrespective of their authenticity. eBay was fined €40m for not doing enough to prevent counterfeit goods being sold on its site. Since the injunction was imposed, however, more than 1,000 LVMH products have been found on eBay’s site.

eBay has argued that it complied with the ruling by deploying specialist software to try to prevent French consumers accessing LVMH products.
Pam Withers, a partner at intellectual property firm Marks & Clerk, says the ruling proves just how difficult it is to police brands online.

“The fact that LVMH is looking to stop the resale of even authentic products on eBay is a side issue, but one that demonstrates the willingness of luxury goods makers to take a heavy-handed approach and force a clampdown on sales in order to protect themselves from potential counterfeiting”, Withers adds.

“The real, underlying problem LVMH and other brand owners have with eBay remains the belief that the online marketplace is not doing enough to prevent fake goods being channelled through their sites.”
 

Issue: 7397 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll