header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

eBay counterfeit fine

The French courts have ordered eBay to pay Louis Vuitton owner, LVMH, €1.7m (£1.5m) for failing to prevent the sale of LVMH products on its website.

The French courts have ordered eBay to pay Louis Vuitton owner, LVMH, €1.7m (£1.5m) for failing to prevent the sale of LVMH products on its website.  
In July 2008, the French courts imposed an injunction barring the sale or purchase of any LVMH products on eBay, irrespective of their authenticity. eBay was fined €40m for not doing enough to prevent counterfeit goods being sold on its site. Since the injunction was imposed, however, more than 1,000 LVMH products have been found on eBay’s site.

eBay has argued that it complied with the ruling by deploying specialist software to try to prevent French consumers accessing LVMH products.
Pam Withers, a partner at intellectual property firm Marks & Clerk, says the ruling proves just how difficult it is to police brands online.

“The fact that LVMH is looking to stop the resale of even authentic products on eBay is a side issue, but one that demonstrates the willingness of luxury goods makers to take a heavy-handed approach and force a clampdown on sales in order to protect themselves from potential counterfeiting”, Withers adds.

“The real, underlying problem LVMH and other brand owners have with eBay remains the belief that the online marketplace is not doing enough to prevent fake goods being channelled through their sites.”
 

Issue: 7397 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll