header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

eBay counterfeit fine

The French courts have ordered eBay to pay Louis Vuitton owner, LVMH, €1.7m (£1.5m) for failing to prevent the sale of LVMH products on its website.

The French courts have ordered eBay to pay Louis Vuitton owner, LVMH, €1.7m (£1.5m) for failing to prevent the sale of LVMH products on its website.  
In July 2008, the French courts imposed an injunction barring the sale or purchase of any LVMH products on eBay, irrespective of their authenticity. eBay was fined €40m for not doing enough to prevent counterfeit goods being sold on its site. Since the injunction was imposed, however, more than 1,000 LVMH products have been found on eBay’s site.

eBay has argued that it complied with the ruling by deploying specialist software to try to prevent French consumers accessing LVMH products.
Pam Withers, a partner at intellectual property firm Marks & Clerk, says the ruling proves just how difficult it is to police brands online.

“The fact that LVMH is looking to stop the resale of even authentic products on eBay is a side issue, but one that demonstrates the willingness of luxury goods makers to take a heavy-handed approach and force a clampdown on sales in order to protect themselves from potential counterfeiting”, Withers adds.

“The real, underlying problem LVMH and other brand owners have with eBay remains the belief that the online marketplace is not doing enough to prevent fake goods being channelled through their sites.”
 

Issue: 7397 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll