header-logo header-logo

Economic downturn sparks panel recruitment drive

01 April 2010
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

More panel members appointed as employment disputes rise

Employment tribunals struggling to cope with the deluge of claims created by the economic downturn are to be given extra help after a major recruitment drive.

The lord chancellor has approved 341 new appointments of panel members to employment tribunals. At tribunal, employment disputes are heard by a panel comprising an employment judge and two impartial panel members, one each with “employer” and “employee” experience. Panel members must have an understanding of employment law and experience of dealing with grievances and other workplace issues.

Jeremy Nixon, employment partner at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says the number of employment disputes had certainly increased. “In an environment where people are dismissed from one job and immediately go into another, they are less inclined to go to the time, expense and hassle of pursuing a claim before a tribunal. Where jobs are scarce, the opposite is true and people may well bring claims before the tribunal.

“Economists say that unemployment is a lagging indicator of economic activity. If this is right and unemployment continues at a high level then the number of tribunal claims will also remain high for a few years to come.”
Kevin Sadler, chief executive of the Tribunals Service says: “Employment tribunals have been under pressure in the last year, as we would expect in more difficult economic conditions.

“But the Tribunals Service is coping well with the higher workload and we have significantly increased the number of cases of which we have successfully disposed. We’re also providing more resources. Thirty five employment judges were recruited last year, the new panel members will increase our capacity and further fee paid judges are being recruited.

“These new members will help to ensure each case is fair and unbiased by providing added insight into employee/employer relations, helping the tribunal to come to its decision.”
 

Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll