header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 June 2007 / Gregory Mitchell
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Economic tort (1)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

OBG ensures economic tort will stay well within its boundaries, says Gregory Mitchell QC

The decision of the House of Lords in OBG v Allan, Douglas v Hello!, Mainstream Properties v Young [2007] UKHL 21, [2007] All ER (D) 44 (May) is one of the most significant decisions on economic tort since Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1 and Quinn v Leathem [1901] AC 495—decided over 100 years ago. The expression “economic tort” is used in this article to refer to inducing breach of contract and unlawful interference with trade.

leading cases

Many of the leading cases on economic tort arise from the master/servant relationship and trade union activity. Lumley v Gye (1854) 3 E & B 114 concerned the opera singer Johanna Wagner being seduced into performing for another theatre. Allen v Flood arose from a bitter demarcation dispute between carpenters and “iron men”. Quinn v Leathem concerned an attempt to force a meat trader’s employees out of work in revenge for their earlier refusal to join a union. Thomson v Deakin [1952] 2

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll