header-logo header-logo

Education (Non-Maintained Special Schools) (England) Regulations 2011 (SI 1999/2257, SI 2002/1982, SI 2007/1088 re-voked)

13 July 2011
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Consolidate with amendments the Non-Maintained Special Schools Regulations 1999, SI 1999/2257.

Provide proprietors with a new right of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal

Make small changes to the governance arrangements for non-maintained special schools to bring them more in line with the arrangements that apply in the maintained sector:

- governors (other than the head teacher) will hold office for a fixed term of 4 years;

- governing bodies must meet at least three times a year; and

- no person paid to work at the school for more than 500 hours in a year may be a parent governor.

Require schools to comply with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, SI 2005/1541.

Make provision for sixth form pupils to withdraw from attending acts of religious worship.

Ensure non-maintained special schools comply with nutritional standard requirements.

Require non-maintained special schools to have a formal complaints procedure and to provide a copy of their welfare inspection reports to parents if they have residential provision.

In force:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll