header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008 / Pablo Cortes
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Features , EU , ADR
printer mail-detail

Effective disputes

Small value claims in cross-border disputes should soon be more cost-effective, says Pablo Cortes

The European Council’s adoption of the proposal for a regulation establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (PE-CONS 3604/07), should ensure that from January next year cross-border disputes between citizens are resolved more effectively. The proposed Regulation deals with low value claims arising in cross-border disputes within the EU, and provides for the direct enforcement of contested decisions in any of the member states without the need for going through mutual recognition of judgments.

The new regime will cover civil and commercial matters, but will exclude a number of claims such as those related to revenue, customs, administrative matters, legal capacity, wills, etc. Under the proposal claims cannot exceed €2,000 in value, excluding interest and legal costs, and its success at this level will determine whether it will be used for higher claims in the future and in other areas, outside the civil and commercial law realm.
 

Technology matters

Currently, information and communication technology (ICT) is not used extensively in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll