header-logo header-logo

An effective global remedy

11 February 2010 / Hugh Tomlinson KC , Anna Caddick
Issue: 7404 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Post Lockton, Anna Caddick & Hugh Tomlinson QC salute the flexibility of Norwich Pharmacal orders

Norwich Pharmacal orders are increasingly sought against internet service providers to discover the identity of individuals who use the internet anonymously as a tool to harass or defame. Although service providers do not usually contest the applications, they require court orders before disclosing the private contact details of their customers.

Where the service provider is based in England, or has business premises here, applications are usually straightforward. If the service provider has an anonymous customer who is, for example, sending abusive or threatening e-mails or making defamatory postings, then the court will order the disclosure of their name and contact details. However, the service providers that have access to the necessary information are often based in the US with no relevant English place of business. This applies, for example, to Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, Wikipedia and Google. These companies will usually not oppose orders being made but do not submit to the jurisdiction of the English courts.

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll