header-logo header-logo

An effective global remedy

11 February 2010 / Hugh Tomlinson KC , Anna Caddick
Issue: 7404 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Post Lockton, Anna Caddick & Hugh Tomlinson QC salute the flexibility of Norwich Pharmacal orders

Norwich Pharmacal orders are increasingly sought against internet service providers to discover the identity of individuals who use the internet anonymously as a tool to harass or defame. Although service providers do not usually contest the applications, they require court orders before disclosing the private contact details of their customers.

Where the service provider is based in England, or has business premises here, applications are usually straightforward. If the service provider has an anonymous customer who is, for example, sending abusive or threatening e-mails or making defamatory postings, then the court will order the disclosure of their name and contact details. However, the service providers that have access to the necessary information are often based in the US with no relevant English place of business. This applies, for example, to Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, Wikipedia and Google. These companies will usually not oppose orders being made but do not submit to the jurisdiction of the English courts.

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll