header-logo header-logo

Electoral whiplash

08 June 2017
Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Politicians offered little hope for claimant lawyers on whiplash reform in their manifestos.

The Conservative manifesto pledged to ‘reduce insurance costs for ordinary motorists by cracking down on fraudulent and exaggerated whiplash claims’. The government’s Prisons and Courts Bill, which was dropped owing to lack of Parliamentary time after the election was called, could therefore be revived. It banned insurers from making offers to settle whiplash claims without medical evidence, introduced tariffs for whiplash injuries lasting between 0 to 24 months, and raised the threshold for personal injury claims in the small claims court from £1,000 to £5,000.

Both the Liberal Democrats and Plaid Cymru support the Conservative’s measures, with the exception of Lib Dem opposition to the small claims limit. Lord Marks, Lib Dem justice spokesperson, told NLJ: ‘We think the raising of the small claims limit to £5,000 is too widely drawn. It should not cover damages for injury sustained otherwise than in road traffic accidents, for example, employer’s negligence or breach of statutory duty, claims against local authorities or occupiers, nuisance claims or assault claims.’

Labour’s manifesto did not mention the issue.

However, UKIP justice spokesman Peter Jewell said: ‘Unlike the Tories, UKIP are not going to pander to powerful lobbying by insurers to make life impossible for claimants.

‘We will reintroduce means tested legal aid for personal injury claimants and wholly disagree with the proposals. They would render most personal injury claims (which can involve considerable pain and suffering for the claimant) impracticable for most claimants as most claims of this nature are between £1,000–£5,000 in value and the insurers are aware of this.’

Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll