header-logo header-logo

08 June 2017
Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Electoral whiplash

Politicians offered little hope for claimant lawyers on whiplash reform in their manifestos.

The Conservative manifesto pledged to ‘reduce insurance costs for ordinary motorists by cracking down on fraudulent and exaggerated whiplash claims’. The government’s Prisons and Courts Bill, which was dropped owing to lack of Parliamentary time after the election was called, could therefore be revived. It banned insurers from making offers to settle whiplash claims without medical evidence, introduced tariffs for whiplash injuries lasting between 0 to 24 months, and raised the threshold for personal injury claims in the small claims court from £1,000 to £5,000.

Both the Liberal Democrats and Plaid Cymru support the Conservative’s measures, with the exception of Lib Dem opposition to the small claims limit. Lord Marks, Lib Dem justice spokesperson, told NLJ: ‘We think the raising of the small claims limit to £5,000 is too widely drawn. It should not cover damages for injury sustained otherwise than in road traffic accidents, for example, employer’s negligence or breach of statutory duty, claims against local authorities or occupiers, nuisance claims or assault claims.’

Labour’s manifesto did not mention the issue.

However, UKIP justice spokesman Peter Jewell said: ‘Unlike the Tories, UKIP are not going to pander to powerful lobbying by insurers to make life impossible for claimants.

‘We will reintroduce means tested legal aid for personal injury claimants and wholly disagree with the proposals. They would render most personal injury claims (which can involve considerable pain and suffering for the claimant) impracticable for most claimants as most claims of this nature are between £1,000–£5,000 in value and the insurers are aware of this.’

Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll