header-logo header-logo

08 June 2017
Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Electoral whiplash

Politicians offered little hope for claimant lawyers on whiplash reform in their manifestos.

The Conservative manifesto pledged to ‘reduce insurance costs for ordinary motorists by cracking down on fraudulent and exaggerated whiplash claims’. The government’s Prisons and Courts Bill, which was dropped owing to lack of Parliamentary time after the election was called, could therefore be revived. It banned insurers from making offers to settle whiplash claims without medical evidence, introduced tariffs for whiplash injuries lasting between 0 to 24 months, and raised the threshold for personal injury claims in the small claims court from £1,000 to £5,000.

Both the Liberal Democrats and Plaid Cymru support the Conservative’s measures, with the exception of Lib Dem opposition to the small claims limit. Lord Marks, Lib Dem justice spokesperson, told NLJ: ‘We think the raising of the small claims limit to £5,000 is too widely drawn. It should not cover damages for injury sustained otherwise than in road traffic accidents, for example, employer’s negligence or breach of statutory duty, claims against local authorities or occupiers, nuisance claims or assault claims.’

Labour’s manifesto did not mention the issue.

However, UKIP justice spokesman Peter Jewell said: ‘Unlike the Tories, UKIP are not going to pander to powerful lobbying by insurers to make life impossible for claimants.

‘We will reintroduce means tested legal aid for personal injury claimants and wholly disagree with the proposals. They would render most personal injury claims (which can involve considerable pain and suffering for the claimant) impracticable for most claimants as most claims of this nature are between £1,000–£5,000 in value and the insurers are aware of this.’

Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll