header-logo header-logo

Electronic execution—what you need to know

26 September 2019 / Stephen Lewis
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Stephen Lewis discusses the Law Commission’s work on electronic execution of documents & why they’ve confirmed that electronic signatures are a viable alternative to handwritten signatures

Earlier this month, the Law Commission of England and Wales published its report ‘Electronic execution of documents’. Our work addresses the use of electronic documents by commercial parties and consumers, including trust deeds and lasting powers of attorney (LPAs).

Our report aims to address uncertainty around electronic signatures by providing an accessible explanation of the law in the increasingly digitalised 21st century. However, we do not seek to mandate or encourage the use of electronic signatures in any particular situation.

Electronic signatures in use

Businesses and individuals are already using electronic signatures on contracts every day. But despite this frequent use, stakeholders told us about their lingering uncertainty over the legal validity of documents executed electronically, particularly where a signature has to be witnessed. They also raised practical concerns which can discourage some people from using this technology. These include:

  • Concerns that electronic
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll