header-logo header-logo

19 March 2020 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Emergencies & extraordinary measures

In a time of crisis what measures can the government introduce under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004? Michael Nash reports

Extraordinary situations require extraordinary measures: thus far good, and obvious. However, questions remain regarding how far the extraordinary measures should go, and how long they should remain in place. While health and welfare are uppermost in people’s minds, care should be taken to ensure the government response is proportionate to risk.

The current Act to deal with the current situation is the Civil Contingencies Act 2004. This Act repealed the Civil Defence Act 1948 and the Civil Defence (Northern Ireland) Act 1950. Part I establishes a new definition of ‘emergency’, which is broadly defined. The part applicable to the current situation concerns ‘events which threaten serious damage to human welfare in a place in the UK, or to the environment of a place in the UK’.

The leading commentators on the Act, Chris Walker and Jim Broderick, in their book, The Civil Contingencies Act 2004: Resilience and the Law in the United

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll