header-logo header-logo

Emergencies & extraordinary measures

19 March 2020 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
In a time of crisis what measures can the government introduce under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004? Michael Nash reports

Extraordinary situations require extraordinary measures: thus far good, and obvious. However, questions remain regarding how far the extraordinary measures should go, and how long they should remain in place. While health and welfare are uppermost in people’s minds, care should be taken to ensure the government response is proportionate to risk.

The current Act to deal with the current situation is the Civil Contingencies Act 2004. This Act repealed the Civil Defence Act 1948 and the Civil Defence (Northern Ireland) Act 1950. Part I establishes a new definition of ‘emergency’, which is broadly defined. The part applicable to the current situation concerns ‘events which threaten serious damage to human welfare in a place in the UK, or to the environment of a place in the UK’.

The leading commentators on the Act, Chris Walker and Jim Broderick, in their book, The Civil Contingencies Act 2004: Resilience and the Law in the United

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll