header-logo header-logo

Emergencies & extraordinary measures

19 March 2020 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
In a time of crisis what measures can the government introduce under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004? Michael Nash reports

Extraordinary situations require extraordinary measures: thus far good, and obvious. However, questions remain regarding how far the extraordinary measures should go, and how long they should remain in place. While health and welfare are uppermost in people’s minds, care should be taken to ensure the government response is proportionate to risk.

The current Act to deal with the current situation is the Civil Contingencies Act 2004. This Act repealed the Civil Defence Act 1948 and the Civil Defence (Northern Ireland) Act 1950. Part I establishes a new definition of ‘emergency’, which is broadly defined. The part applicable to the current situation concerns ‘events which threaten serious damage to human welfare in a place in the UK, or to the environment of a place in the UK’.

The leading commentators on the Act, Chris Walker and Jim Broderick, in their book, The Civil Contingencies Act 2004: Resilience and the Law in the United

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll