header-logo header-logo

19 March 2020 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Emergencies & extraordinary measures

In a time of crisis what measures can the government introduce under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004? Michael Nash reports

Extraordinary situations require extraordinary measures: thus far good, and obvious. However, questions remain regarding how far the extraordinary measures should go, and how long they should remain in place. While health and welfare are uppermost in people’s minds, care should be taken to ensure the government response is proportionate to risk.

The current Act to deal with the current situation is the Civil Contingencies Act 2004. This Act repealed the Civil Defence Act 1948 and the Civil Defence (Northern Ireland) Act 1950. Part I establishes a new definition of ‘emergency’, which is broadly defined. The part applicable to the current situation concerns ‘events which threaten serious damage to human welfare in a place in the UK, or to the environment of a place in the UK’.

The leading commentators on the Act, Chris Walker and Jim Broderick, in their book, The Civil Contingencies Act 2004: Resilience and the Law in the United

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll