header-logo header-logo

Employee benefits…but when?

14 November 2019 / Peter Stevens
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , Employment
printer mail-detail
11469
Peter Stevens traces the recent history of compensation awards for employee inventors
  • A ground-breaking provision and the arrival of two cases in quick succession.
  • Legislation: connected and unconnected persons.
  • Ancillary arguments.

In 1977, a ground-breaking provision was introduced which enabled employees to claim compensation if they invent something of outstanding benefit to their employer.

Section 39 of the Patents Act 1977 provides that an invention made by an employee in the course of his employment belongs to his employer, but s 40 entitles the court to award the employee compensation if the invention is of outstanding benefit to the employer (having regard among other things to the size and nature of the employer’s undertaking) and it is just that the employer should compensate him for it.

Section 41 provides that the award of compensation should be such as will secure for the employee a fair share of the benefit, taking into account (among other things):

  • the nature of his duties;
  • his remuneration and other benefits;
  • the effort and
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll