header-logo header-logo

14 November 2019 / Peter Stevens
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employee benefits…but when?

11469
Peter Stevens traces the recent history of compensation awards for employee inventors
  • A ground-breaking provision and the arrival of two cases in quick succession.
  • Legislation: connected and unconnected persons.
  • Ancillary arguments.

In 1977, a ground-breaking provision was introduced which enabled employees to claim compensation if they invent something of outstanding benefit to their employer.

Section 39 of the Patents Act 1977 provides that an invention made by an employee in the course of his employment belongs to his employer, but s 40 entitles the court to award the employee compensation if the invention is of outstanding benefit to the employer (having regard among other things to the size and nature of the employer’s undertaking) and it is just that the employer should compensate him for it.

Section 41 provides that the award of compensation should be such as will secure for the employee a fair share of the benefit, taking into account (among other things):

  • the nature of his duties;
  • his remuneration and other benefits;
  • the effort and
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll