header-logo header-logo

14 November 2019 / Peter Stevens
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employee benefits…but when?

11469
Peter Stevens traces the recent history of compensation awards for employee inventors
  • A ground-breaking provision and the arrival of two cases in quick succession.
  • Legislation: connected and unconnected persons.
  • Ancillary arguments.

In 1977, a ground-breaking provision was introduced which enabled employees to claim compensation if they invent something of outstanding benefit to their employer.

Section 39 of the Patents Act 1977 provides that an invention made by an employee in the course of his employment belongs to his employer, but s 40 entitles the court to award the employee compensation if the invention is of outstanding benefit to the employer (having regard among other things to the size and nature of the employer’s undertaking) and it is just that the employer should compensate him for it.

Section 41 provides that the award of compensation should be such as will secure for the employee a fair share of the benefit, taking into account (among other things):

  • the nature of his duties;
  • his remuneration and other benefits;
  • the effort and
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS

Family set expands with the formal integration of 4 Brick Court into 42BR Barristers

The Court of Appeal has issued a stern warning to lawyers engaging in the practice of ‘privilege hunting’—obtaining an opponent’s legally privileged information through dishonest means
Legal executives have given a lukewarm reception to the Legal Services Board’s (LSB’s) final report from its regulatory review into Mazur advice and guidance
A homeless single parent offered accommodation in Derby has lost her Supreme Court appeal against the London council making the offer
The Kingdom of Bahrain does not enjoy sovereign immunity from allegations it used surveillance software to spy on dissidents in the UK, the Supreme Court has held
back-to-top-scroll