header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009 / Christopher De Mauny
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Property , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employee patents

Just rewards & employee brilliance: getting the right fit. Christopher de Mauny reports

* * * * * *

The decision in Kelly v GE Healthcare [2009] All ER (D) 114 (Feb) should be of interest to anyone advising technology undertakings or the employees of such undertakings. Without delving into the detail of patent law, a new technical invention may be lead to entitlement to a patent. If the legal conditions for patentability are satisfied a patent confers on its owner the exclusive right to commercialise the subject matter of the patented invention for twenty years: it is a statutory monopoly for that product or process. Thus the decision may also be of interest to advisors of undertakings who are not technology undertakings as such but who conduct any kind of in-house product development that has a technical rather than aesthetic character.

Under the Patents Act 1977 (PA 1977) inventions made by employees in the course of their employment usually belong to their employer. Section 39(1) of PA 1977 provides that an employee's

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll