header-logo header-logo

Employer pension shake-up warning

09 September 2010
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employees with workplace pension schemes could lose out when employers adapt to new pension rules, actuaries have warned.

From October 2012, employers will have to auto-enrol all employees into company pension schemes unless they specifically opt out. This will extend the schemes to millions of extra employees and will be phased in over four years.

Employers will have to contribute one per cent of a worker’s salary, rising to three per cent in 2017. Currently, employers contribute an average of six per cent of employee’s salaries into pensions.

According to the Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA), two-fifths of large private and public sector employers say they are “likely” or “highly likely” to level down to meet the additional cost. The pension pots of existing members would therefore be reduced to make up for the cost of the new ones.

An ACA survey of 210 large employers, with combined pension scheme assets of £166bn, found three-quarters of employers supported the principle of auto-enrolment, but 70% felt the auto-enrolment regulatory regime “appears complex”.

Three-quarters thought employees with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll