header-logo header-logo

Employer pension shake-up warning

09 September 2010
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employees with workplace pension schemes could lose out when employers adapt to new pension rules, actuaries have warned.

From October 2012, employers will have to auto-enrol all employees into company pension schemes unless they specifically opt out. This will extend the schemes to millions of extra employees and will be phased in over four years.

Employers will have to contribute one per cent of a worker’s salary, rising to three per cent in 2017. Currently, employers contribute an average of six per cent of employee’s salaries into pensions.

According to the Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA), two-fifths of large private and public sector employers say they are “likely” or “highly likely” to level down to meet the additional cost. The pension pots of existing members would therefore be reduced to make up for the cost of the new ones.

An ACA survey of 210 large employers, with combined pension scheme assets of £166bn, found three-quarters of employers supported the principle of auto-enrolment, but 70% felt the auto-enrolment regulatory regime “appears complex”.

Three-quarters thought employees with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll