header-logo header-logo

09 September 2010
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employer pension shake-up warning

Employees with workplace pension schemes could lose out when employers adapt to new pension rules, actuaries have warned.

From October 2012, employers will have to auto-enrol all employees into company pension schemes unless they specifically opt out. This will extend the schemes to millions of extra employees and will be phased in over four years.

Employers will have to contribute one per cent of a worker’s salary, rising to three per cent in 2017. Currently, employers contribute an average of six per cent of employee’s salaries into pensions.

According to the Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA), two-fifths of large private and public sector employers say they are “likely” or “highly likely” to level down to meet the additional cost. The pension pots of existing members would therefore be reduced to make up for the cost of the new ones.

An ACA survey of 210 large employers, with combined pension scheme assets of £166bn, found three-quarters of employers supported the principle of auto-enrolment, but 70% felt the auto-enrolment regulatory regime “appears complex”.

Three-quarters thought employees with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll