header-logo header-logo

07 April 2020
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Employers grapple with COVID-19

More than three-quarters of employers have furloughed some staff or plan to do so, according to benchmarking research by law firm Lewis Silkin into the impact of COVID-19

The firm surveyed 67 in-house counsel or senior human resources leaders across major businesses on their use of the Job Retention (furlough) Scheme, under which the government pays 80% of salary up to a maximum of £2,500 per month. Only 23% of respondents haven’t furloughed anyone and don’t think it will be necessary. Of those making full use of the scheme, only 13% plan to rotate staff who are on furlough at any one time.

More than 65% are topping up the government subsidy, and nearly 45% are topping up to full pay.

Amid stories such as the airline pilot now working as a Tesco delivery driver to help out during the pandemic, 84% of employers said they have no objection if furloughed staff wish to work for the NHS, social care, supermarkets or other essential service. Only 9% of employers have asked staff to undertake training while furloughed.

Those employees still working face considerable uncertainty―more than a third of businesses are seeking to cut pay or hours.

However, employers are also taking the initiative in supporting those working from home, with 84% proactively encouraging social interaction among employees, 73% providing information on safe workstation set up and 29% laying on extra mental health support services.

James Davies, employment partner at Lewis Silkin, said: ‘As businesses adjust to the new normal, minds will inevitably turn to seeking ways to mitigate the longer-term impact of the disruption and even planning ahead for a brighter future.

‘This might include rolling out training initiatives, both to maintain company culture and also to prepare staff for successful re-introduction once they are brought back fully into the workplace.’

Issue: 7882 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll