header-logo header-logo

07 April 2020
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Employers grapple with COVID-19

More than three-quarters of employers have furloughed some staff or plan to do so, according to benchmarking research by law firm Lewis Silkin into the impact of COVID-19

The firm surveyed 67 in-house counsel or senior human resources leaders across major businesses on their use of the Job Retention (furlough) Scheme, under which the government pays 80% of salary up to a maximum of £2,500 per month. Only 23% of respondents haven’t furloughed anyone and don’t think it will be necessary. Of those making full use of the scheme, only 13% plan to rotate staff who are on furlough at any one time.

More than 65% are topping up the government subsidy, and nearly 45% are topping up to full pay.

Amid stories such as the airline pilot now working as a Tesco delivery driver to help out during the pandemic, 84% of employers said they have no objection if furloughed staff wish to work for the NHS, social care, supermarkets or other essential service. Only 9% of employers have asked staff to undertake training while furloughed.

Those employees still working face considerable uncertainty―more than a third of businesses are seeking to cut pay or hours.

However, employers are also taking the initiative in supporting those working from home, with 84% proactively encouraging social interaction among employees, 73% providing information on safe workstation set up and 29% laying on extra mental health support services.

James Davies, employment partner at Lewis Silkin, said: ‘As businesses adjust to the new normal, minds will inevitably turn to seeking ways to mitigate the longer-term impact of the disruption and even planning ahead for a brighter future.

‘This might include rolling out training initiatives, both to maintain company culture and also to prepare staff for successful re-introduction once they are brought back fully into the workplace.’

Issue: 7882 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll