header-logo header-logo

Employers on suicide watch

24 April 2008 / Victoria Lee , Caroline Doran
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Community care , Employment
printer mail-detail

A recent House of Lords ruling explores issues of liability on the suicide of an employee. Caroline Doran and Victoria Lee report

The courts accept that pressure at work can take its toll on both our physical and mental wellbeing. Over the years the courts have accepted that overwork, bullying, lack of supervision and pace of work can all cause work stress. The mental consequences of stress range from sleeplessness through to clinical depression and suicide.

In , they have a name for “overwork-related deaths” (including suicides): karojisatsu. This is officially recognised and compensated. Figures released in May 2007 showed that, of the record 205 individuals in qualifying for worker's compensation insurance payouts in 2006, 65 involved suicide.

 

Corr v IBC Vehicles

The recent decision by the House of Lords, in Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd [2008] UKHL 13 HL, [2006] All ER (D) 466 (Mar) sent shockwaves through the business community.

Thomas Corr

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll