header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008 / Victoria Lee , Caroline Doran
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Community care , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employers on suicide watch

A recent House of Lords ruling explores issues of liability on the suicide of an employee. Caroline Doran and Victoria Lee report

The courts accept that pressure at work can take its toll on both our physical and mental wellbeing. Over the years the courts have accepted that overwork, bullying, lack of supervision and pace of work can all cause work stress. The mental consequences of stress range from sleeplessness through to clinical depression and suicide.

In , they have a name for “overwork-related deaths” (including suicides): karojisatsu. This is officially recognised and compensated. Figures released in May 2007 showed that, of the record 205 individuals in qualifying for worker's compensation insurance payouts in 2006, 65 involved suicide.

 

Corr v IBC Vehicles

The recent decision by the House of Lords, in Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd [2008] UKHL 13 HL, [2006] All ER (D) 466 (Mar) sent shockwaves through the business community.

Thomas

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll