header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013
Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Hazel v New Eltham Conservative Club [2013] All ER (D) 318 (May)

It was well established that in assessing compensation: (i) the task of the tribunal was to assess the loss flowing from the dismissal, using its common sense, experience and sense of justice. In the normal case that required it to assess for how long the employee would have been employed but for the dismissal; (ii) if the employer sought to contend that the employee would or might have ceased to be employed in any event had fair procedures been followed, or alternatively would not have continued in employment indefinitely, it was for him to adduce any relevant evidence on which he wished to rely; (iii) however, there would be circumstances where the nature of the evidence which the employer wished to adduce, or on which he sought to rely, was so unreliable that the tribunal might take the view that the whole exercise of seeking to reconstruct what might have been was so riddled with uncertainty that no sensible prediction based on that evidence could properly be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll