header-logo header-logo

Employment

20 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Czarnecki v Choice Textiles Ltd UKEAT/0331/12/GE, [2013] All ER (D) 77 (Sep)

In determining a claim for arrears of pay, it was settled law that: (i) the starting point was the contract of employment; (ii) if the contract of employment entitled the employee at least to consideration of the exercise of a discretion, it would be a breach of that contract not to consider its exercise; (iii) where a discretion was said to be exercisable only upon some prior facts having been established, there could be no question factually of any award becoming payable unless those factual preconditions were satisfied; (iv) if the discretion had been exercised, then the exercise might be reviewed; (v) if the discretion had not been exercised then the employee was entitled to be put into the position in which he would have been if the contract had been fully and properly performed; (vi) in such a situation the employer would have given proper consideration to the exercise of the discretion; (vii) the task in assessing compensation for the breach therefore, was to ask what that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll