header-logo header-logo

20 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Czarnecki v Choice Textiles Ltd UKEAT/0331/12/GE, [2013] All ER (D) 77 (Sep)

In determining a claim for arrears of pay, it was settled law that: (i) the starting point was the contract of employment; (ii) if the contract of employment entitled the employee at least to consideration of the exercise of a discretion, it would be a breach of that contract not to consider its exercise; (iii) where a discretion was said to be exercisable only upon some prior facts having been established, there could be no question factually of any award becoming payable unless those factual preconditions were satisfied; (iv) if the discretion had been exercised, then the exercise might be reviewed; (v) if the discretion had not been exercised then the employee was entitled to be put into the position in which he would have been if the contract had been fully and properly performed; (vi) in such a situation the employer would have given proper consideration to the exercise of the discretion; (vii) the task in assessing compensation for the breach therefore, was to ask what that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll