header-logo header-logo

15 January 2010
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

British Telecommunications plc v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 8 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 10 (Jan)

Paragraphs 1 to 3 of Sch 2 to the British Telecommunications Act 1981, which dealt with the transfer of rights and liabilities under a contract of employment from the former Post Office to British Telecommunications plc, were to be read together.

They were a series of provisions showing how interests in property and rights and liabilities were to be attributed either to the claimant or to the Post Office in situations where the position might not have been obvious. The Act provided a default position for instances where both undertakings of the Post Office had an interest in relation to property, and that mechanism was contained in paras 1 and 2 of Sch 2.

That default position was the employees were transferred into the organisation in whose business they had been working on the day before the transfer. Further, s 33(2) of the Act clearly contemplated that rights that had existed under a contract that had come to an end

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll