header-logo header-logo

30 June 2016
Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Taiwo v Olaigbe and another; Onu v Akwiwu and another [2016] UKSC 31, [2016] All ER (D) 134 (Jun)

 

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant migrant domestic workers’ appeals against their race discrimination claims where their mistreatment by their employers had had nothing to do with their nationality, but related to their vulnerability arising from their immigration status. Parliament had not included immigration status in the list of protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010 and discrimination on account of an employee’s immigration status did not amount to discrimination on account of race, for the purposes of that Act.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll