header-logo header-logo

12 June 2026
Issue: 8165 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Legacy Act ruling leaves rights and remedies apart

252167
© 2017 JMiks/Shutterstock
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised

Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Otchie of 12 Old Square Chambers analyses the court’s ruling on the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023.

The judgment confirmed that investigations into alleged unlawful killings and torture must remain capable, at least in principle, of leading to criminal accountability. However, while the court found aspects of the statutory scheme incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, it stopped short of disapplying the legislation, issuing only a declaration of incompatibility.

Otchie argues that the decision reflects a constitutional balancing act between judicial oversight and parliamentary sovereignty. The result is a judgment that preserves demanding rights standards while limiting their immediate practical effect. As he notes, Dillon sits at the intersection of 'truth and accountability' and legislative control.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll