header-logo header-logo

20 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Neary v Governing Body of St Albans Girls’ School and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1190, [2009] All ER (D) 144 (Nov)

Parliament had deliberately not incorporated CPR 3.9(1) into employment tribunal practice when it chose to incorporate the overriding objective of the CPR, since it had always been the intention of Parliament that tribunal proceedings should be as short, simple and informal as possible. Where Parliament had decided not to incorporate into tribunal practice a set of requirements such as those in CPR r 3.9, it was not proper for the courts to incorporate them by judicial decision.

The judge had to consider all the relevant factors and had to avoid considering any irrelevant ones. Although he might find the list in CPR r 3.9(1) to be a helpful checklist, that list might not cover everything relevant, and he was not under any duty expressly to set out his views on every one of those factors.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll